Suggested by kimi
The Fault In Our Stars, by John Green, is a book that's apparently a huge bestseller. It's so popular that there's already a movie out based on it, which means a lot of people must have liked it a lot. I've never seen the movie, so this will be a review based strictly on the book, but given what I think of the book, I don't think the movie would be much good. And a short disclaimer before I begin - I know this book has its avid fans, and has been given lots and lots of positive reviews. This review is just my opinion, which you can feel free to disregard if you want.
The main character of this story is Hazel Grace, a sixteen-year-old diagnosed with cancer. She knows she'll be dead within five years - if she's lucky. But when an incredibly handsome boy turns up at her cancer support group, her life begins to turn into a roller-coaster ride that seems like it can only go up. She and Augustus Waters start seeing each other regularly, getting to know each other better. She knows she's in love, but hesitates to get closer to him because she doesn't want him to be heartbroken when she dies. Then Augustus admits that he's had a cancer relapse, and that it's spread to his entire body. Hazel has to watch as he starts to deteriorate from the laughing, drama-inclined person she knew to someone wallowing in depression and hopelessness.
That's a quick plot synopsis of The Fault In Our Stars. In a nutshell, this is a book about two cancer patients who fall in love but know they have only a few years of life left. The main struggle in the book is the two of them trying to answer the questions: Why am I here? Will I be remembered after I'm gone? You know from the moment you open the book that one or both will be dead before you get to the end - a somewhat depressing beginning to a somewhat depressing book.
As far as characters go, I was less than impressed. Hazel wasn't too bad, but her boyfriend Augustus was pretty shallow. Almost everything you learn about him through the course of the book can be traced back to Hazel in one way or another, and it seemed to me that he existed merely to be there for her - to make her happy while he was well and to make her sad when he was dying. Also, the things that Hazel found attractive about him - his sense of humor and his tendency to be theatrically dramatic - didn't do much for me. I didn't find him funny, and his dramatic flair seemed silly and pointless to me. More importantly, I couldn't follow Hazel and Augustus's arguments about the meaning of life and what the afterlife would be, which was a pretty important part of the book. I couldn't figure out where they were getting any foundation for the ideas they had, so the whole discussion was confusing. John Green's beliefs are definitely not mine, and so the point he was trying to make with this book didn't resonate with me, and without that point, his story doesn't have any appeal.
Besides having a theme that I didn't agree with and some pretty shallow characters, The Fault In Our Stars has a quite a lot of bad language and some other bad content. I was very tired of reading swear words after only fifty pages. My soapbox stand is this: if you're an author, surely you have a wider vocabulary than that! Also, when Hazel and Augustus are in Holland, they spend an afternoon alone together in his apartment. What they did during that time is part of why I give this book such a low review and why this isn't a book I'd be telling a ten-year-old to read. Or for that matter, a fourteen-year-old.
In fact, the only really positive thing I have to say about The Fault In Our Stars is that it did make me teary toward the end, after Augustus died. I usually say any book that moves me enough to make me have an emotional reaction is a good book, but obviously I don't feel this way about The Fault In Our Stars. Part of the reason those last twenty pages made me sad is because the events were pretty sad - Augustus was only 18 or 19, but his life is over. It was during this small, twenty-page space when Hazel was dealing with Augustus's death that John Green actually managed to do some good writing. That was the only moment when I could really connect with the story and other than that, The Fault In Our Stars was a flop.
Would I suggest you read this book? No. I'm glad I read it, because now I'll know what people are talking about when they start to rave about how good The Fault In Our Stars is. I won't be one of those people, and I don't think I'll ever read it again. It lacked meaning and purpose, and I don't have a lot of respect for authors who use bad language in their books. In the end, The Fault In Our Stars is a book I don't think I'll be suggesting as reading material for anyone. For me it holds no interest.
Thank you! I wanted to know if I should try it out. Anything unworthy to you is definitely unworthy. Plus, the movie preview wasn't very interesting to me. I'm beginning to think that the movie was only made because that space you talked about. :-P
ReplyDeleteI think Noodle generally gets it right, but I have to say I disagree with this one. I think that the book gives a realistic image of those with chronic, terminal illness.
ReplyDeleteNo, it isn't for younger kids, but is appropriate for older teens and adults.
I found it to be a moving book personally and felt the author really gave me a view of life from the standpoint of the characters.
~kimi
Thanks for sharing your opinion, though, Kimi. I was hoping you'd comment and say what you thought of the book. :)
DeleteI think in a way I agree with you - this book does give a pretty realistic image of people with those kinds of illnesses. I just think that John Greene communicated it in a confusing way with some poor characters.
But again, thanks for sharing! I'm glad to have gotten your thoughts on this book as well.
I've thought on it more, and think I get your point of view.
DeleteMy life as a nurse who has dealt with death and terminal illness for so many years is one that usually requires putting on a certain face for others. While you care for someone in a clinical setting, it isn't always beneficial for you to let emotions cloud what your role is.
There is a required distance as you are there for them and to be who and what they need you to be.
This book put a face and story on 3 decades of patients for me. It was real. I feel like I knew these people.
People aren't always good and are often shallow, but it doesn't take away that they still are people. Most are lost. Most have no real hope.
Sometimes to me, a good read isn't something that is always clear, but something at can evoke a feeling or a memory that pushes me to sort out things in my heart and in my head.
This book did that for me. It forced me to look at the fact that life is too short and painful. It reminded me of people I've known who are now gone.
I really hoped you'd be moved by it as much as I was, but that is why there are so many people telling so many stories.... we all have different things that move us and make us evaluate who and why we are.
Thanks for always sharing your great thoughts. You clan kids make me think, with you at the top of the list.
kimi
I think I can see why you'd have this point of view on this book. I think the difference lies in our viewpoints and the life experience we've had -- obviously you've had more than I have, and of a different kind. So his book resonates with us differently. To me, this book was unsatisfying. It didn't move me the way it moved you, but you're right. That's why there are umpteen million books out there. Everybody is different and is moved by different things. Not everyone will resonate with every story.
DeleteGreat discussion, kimi! I didn't expect to get into a back-and-forth over this book, but I'm glad you brought it up! I don't often get to expand much on my viewpoint on a book beyond the review, and this has been a nice opportunity to say a little more. :)
~Noodle